Dollar Photo Club In the action, the bank did not prove that it handed over the Dollar Photo Club loan contract to the plaintiff In his vote, the rapporteur, judge Saul Steil, pointed out that the financial institution did not prove the delivery of a copy of the contract to the author. He also explained that the first instance decision found that there was a breach of the information duty imposed on the bank. less than a minute after the formalization of a separate contract, intermediated by a third-party company outside the process, whose headquarters are in Ceará. The rapporteur also confirmed the conviction for moral damage.
He understood that it was proven that the deductions made to the retiree's bank account caused suffering to the plaintiff. The judge considered that, although the jurisprudence of the TJ-SC is firm in the sense that undue discounts on a current account do not mean a presumption of moral damage, it is necessary to analyze the particularities of the specific case. "The banking house made several discounts in the amount of R$ 380.25 in the modest benefit of the plaintiff, who receives R$ 1,100 in the gross mod Chinese American Phone Number List ality, consuming a significant portion of his only source of income", he recorded when stipulating the compensation in R$ 5 thousand. The retiree was represented by the firm Urqueta Advocacia .Constitutional Seeing an invasion of the exclusive competence of the head of the Executive Branch, the Special Body of the Court of Justice of São Paulo annulled a law from Guarulhos (SP), a parliamentary initiative, which provided for the provision of vaccination cards in braille system for people with disabilities visual.
The decision was by majority vote. Weyo/Freepik Weyo/Freepik Mandating the provision of documents in Braille is not the responsibility of the Legislature, says TJ According to the city hall, author of the action, by creating the obligation to issue a vaccination card in Braille, the rule would have advanced acts of planning, direction, organization and execution of public administration activities, whose legislative initiative is reserved privately to the head of the Executive . The municipality also claimed that the law violated the principles of administrative reserve and separation of powers. The rapporteur, judge Matheus Fontes, recognized the unconstitutionality of the text and said that the topic in question falls within the administrative organization of the municipality, which does not authorize the initiative on the part of the local Legislature.